@afterglowlee Yepp :-) Aware of your (great!) use case. Thanks! Know of others? Usage in the wild?
@lysander07 Thanks for the clarification on your GKG usage. (Watched the slides from my cell phone, overlooked the small-print paper refs.)
@lysander07 Do you already have a citable/shareable publication w/ the GKG ground truth? Was thinking of a similar approach. Interesting!
@danbri Congratulations. Happy it all worked out :-)
@mahemoff Kinda sad, but I’ve developed a habit to check all G+ links that I post in a private tab pre-posting… Visibility rules complexity.
@mahemoff Hmmm, the G+ link 404s badly…
@mostafagalal Hope you like it.
Pinged on Twitter OAuth requ., @al3x: “I care bout it in the way u might care bout a cousin who’s an alcoholic & just keeps doing dumb shit”
@aygul Congratulations! Time to move on ;-)
@timbray Respectfully disagree & I do care, e.g., in paper reviews: it should be “website” as in Wikipedia, but “the Web” & “the Internet”.