RT @olyerickson: Is Google+ big enough to handle a #LinkedData - related debate? http://t.co/V9F0IjX /via @edd @tomayac
@olyerickson LOL :-) They call this a stress test…
RT @edd: Excellent debate on the #SemanticWeb vs. #LinkedData debate developing on my Google+ right now edd.me/r7QONQ
@manusporny Wow. This article seems quite badly researched… I was shaking my head reading it, but finally saw their update w/ your input.
@kwelle Good luck with that! Same here, except that it’#DeRiVE201111 instead o#SDOW201111 & that there’s no vacation aprè#ISWC2011#ISWC2011
@wvandolleweerd @RubenVerborgh Fair enough. I guess I’ll change my .gitignore practice. Thanks for the arguments!
@wvandolleweerd For my main use case (versioning #LaTeX files for papers), I don’t want to see changes in my .gitignore (as it’s static).
You have to put .gitignore in your .gitignore file. The #recursion geek in me likes this. #Git
@dret Congratulations. Sounds like a great opportunity.