@TheRealNooshu @jweinraub @davemann1871 I have started work on a polyfill that could be pulled in on demand (or for now: always 🙃): https://t.co/TGCHf87GVB.
Good reminder from â¦@jaffathecakeâ© on encoding data for POST requests: “Similar to `URLSearchParams`, you can use `FormData` directly as a fetch bodyâ€. https://t.co/mwZIhbHBXx
steveruizok Live cursors are interesting. You don’t really want to be constantly sending updates but you do want the cursors to move smoothly and naturally like this. What’s the trick? pic.twitter.com/4gfIc7c4kA
@TypeSong Oh, absolutely. One of the open questions for this proposal is what is in and what is out of scope. I’ll try adding IP addresses tomorrow.
@jweinraub @TheRealNooshu @davemann1871 Looks like you all could be interested in my `Intl.InputMask` input masking ðŸŽproposal: https://t.co/2WqAx4nGAI.
@razvancaliman @addyosmani @aerotwist @hashseed @briankardell CC: @DotProto.
RT @tomayac: I’ve started working on a polyfill for my `Intl.InputMask` 🎠proposal (https://t.co/eeHfqm7Hsj) so folks—including myself—can…
RT @smashingmag: 🔖 The State Of Web Workers In 2021, by @DasSurma.
https://t.co/z1leDF5uX2 https://t.co/EzU76T2Qxk
@rauschma I’m at the _very_ beginning of this, but I hope this proposal would improve upon the status quo eventually by allowing us to separate data representation from data storage.
Disclaimer: this is not production-ready, there are still many flaws.
@mischmerz It’s early stage and definitely not production-ready. Purely for getting a first feel.
@html5test Partly implemented. For the most up-to-date version try Edge Canary on Windows.
@mtomweb Yes, there is quite a lot of standardization prior art that the proposal would build upon (e.g., RFC 3966 https://t.co/KypVtI8Tym and E.123 https://t.co/pDc8YZtXf3 [PDF]). The joy of `Intl.*` is that as a developer you don’t have to worry about t
I’ve started working on a polyfill for my `Intl.InputMask` 🎠proposal (https://t.co/eeHfqm7Hsj) so folks—including myself—can get a better feel for it. I’m quite biased, but I like it… 🙂
Try the demo: https://t.co/KS9ZEWzw2C.
See the source
@mischmerz Yes, please see this article for details: https://t.co/QCzEhaNPNj.
@schweinepriestr One of the super powers of the proposal would be to decouple the representation from the actual `tel:` data, all powered by JS in the background:
🇺🇸 <a href=”tel:+12015550123”>201-555-0123</a>
🇩🇪 <a href=”tel:+494012345678”>
@guybedford Just opened https://t.co/2amQ1xQj5V which adds feature detection for `link[rel=modulepreload]` to avoid shimming on supporting browsers.
@foolip Never seen a Google job ad with a Roman leveling system. Our usual L\d+ leveling system is public: https://t.co/ZmnlxOz5HW. Fun how it’s not even consistently Roman. Just a random observation…
@dalmaer @aerotwist @Jack_Franklin Where is the dislike button on this platform?